<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>AI on Matt Thornton</title>
    <link>http://localhost:1313/tags/ai/</link>
    <description>Recent content in AI on Matt Thornton</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:46:37 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://localhost:1313/tags/ai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Can AI ever be sentient? On LaMDA and the wider debate</title>
      <link>http://localhost:1313/general/can-ai-ever-be-sentient/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://localhost:1313/general/can-ai-ever-be-sentient/</guid>
      
        <description>&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;rsquo;re reading this then chances are you already well aware of the recent AI-themed issue: operator of Google-owned LaMDA, Blake Lemoine, was suspended from his job for claiming that his AI was sentient.
(Well actually, he was suspended for sharing company secrets, in the form of the chat transcript.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;rsquo;re not up to speed, then you won&amp;rsquo;t have to look far to find the story. I first read about it on &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/13/google_lamda_sentient_claims/&#34;&gt;The Register&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The huge interest initially was sparked because of Google&amp;rsquo;s handling of the situation - everyone loves a little-person-vs-big-corp scenario but everyone soon got bored of that and then piled in on the actual claims - was the chatbot indeed sentient?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>